One Response to “Thanks to Sen Vitter !”

1. Misha Blythe says:

   January 30, 2010 at 1:00 pm

   TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
   IN MY OPINION, THE STATEMENT SAYING “ONLY WHEN THOSE PRODUCTS CONTAIN OR ARE ADVERTISED USING OTHER TRADEMARKS OR IDENTIFIERS OF THE SAINTS” IS AS BROAD DEFINITION AND LEAVES ALOT OF ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION. I THINK THAT SPECIFIC STATEMENT IS THEIR “LOOPHOLE” TO CONTINUE TO INFRINGE ON US, THE WHO DAT NATION. THOUGH, JOKINGLY, I MUST SAY IT SEEMS VERY MUCH LIKE A LOUISIANA LAW, LEAVING LOOPHOLES. ANOTHER THING THEY HAVE PROBABLY STOLEN FROM US. AGAIN, I SAY THAT JOKINGLY ABOUT LA. LAW.
   BUT THE NFL’S DEFINITION IS VERY BROAD AND I THINK IT SHOULD BE MORE SPECIFIC.
   THANK YOU,
   WHO DAT !!! GO SAINTS !!BLACK AND GOLD SUPERBOWL !! WE DAT !!!
   SINCERELY,
   MISHA BLYTHE, ONE OF MANY OF THE OUTRAGED WHO DAT NATION